April 8, 2025

Federal Lawsuit Against North Carolina’s eCourts System Moves Forward

Community Resource Consultants Inc. (CRCI)

Community Resource Consultants Inc. (CRCI) is a Michigan-based organization specializing in trauma rehabilitation medical case management. With over 34 years of experience, CRCI is dedicated to empowering survivors of catastrophic auto accidents to regain control of their lives and achieve both physical and emotional well-being. Their team of Licensed Master Social Workers (LMSWs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) are experts in navigating the complexities of today’s healthcare system, ensuring that survivors receive the necessary services for their recovery and rehabilitation. CRCI’s core values include advocacy, people, knowledge, and dependability, reflecting their commitment to being leading advocates and facilitators of long-term collaborative care.

News Summary

A federal lawsuit has been approved to proceed against North Carolina’s eCourts system, which faces accusations of wrongful arrests and extended jail times due to software glitches. U.S. District Judge William Osteen has allowed the case to continue against Tyler Technologies and the Mecklenburg County Sheriff while dismissing claims against the Wake County Sheriff. As the eCourts system expands, concerns about its impact on individuals caught in legal limbo persist, raising serious questions about its efficacy moving forward.

System Glitch Turns Legal Woes for North Carolina’s eCourts

In a surprising turn of events, a federal lawsuit has been given the green light to proceed against North Carolina’s electronic court records and case management system, affectionately dubbed eCourts. This cutting-edge system is accused of contributing to wrongful arrests and unnecessarily prolonged jail times. Talk about a legal headache!

A New Chapter in the Legal Drama

U.S. District Judge William Osteen has ruled that the lawsuit can move forward against Tyler Technologies, the brains behind the eCourts software, as well as the Mecklenburg County Sheriff, Garry McFadden. While this is a small victory for the plaintiffs, Judge Osteen threw out a related claim against Wake County Sheriff Willie Rowe, citing something called statutory immunity for conducting warrants. It appears that while some get to stay in the race, others will need to sit this one out.

The Backstory: eCourts Rollout

This legal battle stems from the recent launch of the eCourts system in February 2023, which was rolled out in Wake County and three other test counties before expanding to Mecklenburg. Now, eCourts boasts a presence in 62 counties across North Carolina, with plans to reach all the remaining counties by fall 2025. However, things haven’t exactly gone as smoothly as hoped.

Around a dozen plaintiffs have come forward, asserting that the combination of software glitches and human error within the eCourts system led to multiple arrests stemming from the same warrants. This is not just a minor issue—many individuals have found themselves stuck in jail longer than necessary following the rollout. Reports suggest that dozens experienced extended stays in the Mecklenburg County jail, with the system’s kick-off adding some serious turbulence to their lives.

Software Woes and Training Gaps

Judge Osteen noted that the plaintiffs have made a compelling case that Tyler Technologies dropped the ball when it comes to ensuring the software was up to snuff and free of defects. That’s a hefty claim, especially considering the stakes involved. Furthermore, it seems the Mecklenburg Sheriff’s Office didn’t quite provide enough training for its deputies on how to navigate the eCourts software, which only amplified the alleged issues and, in turn, the constitutional implications for those impacted.

Initially, two leaders from the state’s Administrative Office of the Courts were included in the lawsuit, but they were dropped last year, leaving fewer figures for plaintiffs to contend with in this spirited legal fight.

What’s Next: Expanding the Case

While a trial date has yet to be established, the plaintiffs are eager to broaden their lawsuit to encompass more individuals whose lives were disrupted due to the eCourts system. In a different twist of fate, another lawsuit is adding new defendants, including McFadden as well as Clerk Elisa Chinn-Gary, bringing the total number of plaintiffs to an impressive 13.

During a recent court hearing, the plaintiffs received permission to amend their complaint. They face a deadline of April 9 for any new motions to be filed. The new claims spotlight allegations of excessive jail time caused by eCourts quirks, including accusations that old warrants dating back to 2001 were strangely revived.

The Road Ahead for eCourts

As North Carolina moves from a paper-based court system to this high-tech digital arena intended to enhance efficiency, the bumpy road ahead raises questions about how well the eCourts system will actually perform. While the goal is undoubtedly to create a streamlined experience for all involved, it remains clear that addressing these serious concerns is paramount.

In the end, whether eCourts will cement its place in the state’s judicial landscape remains to be seen. With so many lives hanging in the balance, the unfolding drama continues to be one worth watching.